O pensamento por analogias no design: o uso de jogos como uma ferramenta facilitadora
Palavras-chave:
design por analogias, jogos, design e criatividade, processo criativo, designResumo
Este artigo tem como objetivo discutir o pensamento por analogias no design e o uso de ferramentas no processo de projeto que possam estimular a criação de conexões mentais durante a geração de ideias. Para tanto, traz uma revisão de literatura sobre o pensamento analógico e o uso de estímulos como fontes de inspiração e apresenta o uso de um jogo como uma ferramenta para auxiliar o pensamento por analogias no design. Os resultados demonstraram que uso deste tipo de ferramenta contribui para a expansão do espaço problema-solução e para a criação de analogias estruturais, entre diferentes domínios de conhecimento.
Referências
BLANCHETTE, C. B.; DUNBAR, K. How analogies are generated: the roles of structural and superficial similarity. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1, 2000, pp.108-124.
BONNARDEL, N. Designing future products: what difficulties do designers encounter and how can their creative process be supported? Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assesment and Refabilitation, 41, 2012, pp.5296-5303.
BONNARDEL, N.; MARMECHE, E. Evocation process by novice and expert designers: towwards stimulating analogical thinking. Creativity and Innovation Management, v.13, n.3, 2004, pp.176-186.
BOUCHARD, C.; OMHOVER, J.F.; MOUGENOT, C.; AOUSSAT, A.; WESTERMAN, S. TRENDS: a content-based information retrieval system for designers. Proceedings of Design Computing and Cognition - DCC08, Atlanta, 2008.
CAI, H.; YI-LUEN DO, E.; ZIMRING, C. M. Extended linkography and distance graph in design evaluation: an empirical study of the dual effects of inspiration sources in creative design. Design Studies, 31, 2010, pp.146-168.
CASAKIN, H.; GOLDSCHMIDT, G. Reasoning by visual analogy in design problem-solving: the role of guidance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, 2000, pp.105-119.
CASAKIN, H.; TIMMEREN, A. V. Analogies as creative inspiration sources in the design studio: the teamwork. Atiner´s Conference Paper Series No ARC2014-1188: 4th Annual International Conference on Architecture, Athens, Greece, 6-9 jul, 2014. Athens Institute for Education and Research, 2014.
CHAKRABARTI, Amaresh et al. Idea Inspire 3.0—A tool for analogical design. In: International Conference on Research into Design. Springer, Singapore, 2017.
CHAKRABARTI, A.; SHU, L. Biologically inspired design. AI EDAM, Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 24(4), 2010.
CHRISTENSEN, B.T.; SCHUNN, C. D. The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and preinventive structure: the case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition, v.35 n.1, 2007, pp. 29-38.
CROSS, N. Designerly ways of knowing. London: Springer, 2006.
DORST, K. CROSS, N. Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, 22, pp.421-437, 2001.
DOUMAS, L. A. A.; HUMMEL, J. E.; SANDHOFER, C. M. A theory of the Discovery and prediction of relationa concepts. Psychological Review, 115, 1, 2008, pp.1-43.
EASTMAN, C. New directions in design cognition: studies of representation and recall. In: EASTMAN, C.; MCCRACKEN, M., NEWSTETTER, W. Design knowing and learning: cognition in design education. Oxford: Elsevier, 2001.
ECKERT, Claudia; STACEY, Martin. Adaptation of sources of inspiration in knitwear design. Creativity Research Journal, v. 15, n. 4, p. 355-384, 2003.
FULLERTON, T. Game Design workshop. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, 2008
GENTER, D. Bootstrapping the minds: analogical process and symbol systems. Cognitive Sciences, 34, 2010, pp.752-775.
GENTER, D.; KURTZ, K. J. Relations, objetcts, and the composition of analogies. Cognitive Science, 30, 2006, pp.609-642.
GENTER, D.; SMITH, L. Analogical reasoning. In: RAMACHANDRAM, V.S. (Ed). Encyclopedia of human behavior. 2 ed. Oxford, UK: Elsevier, 2012, pp.130-136.
GIBSON, J.J. The theory of affordances in perceiving, acting and knowing. Eds. Robert Shaw and John Bransford, 1977.
GOEL, A. K.; McADAMS, D. A.; STONE, R. B. (eds). Biologically inspired design: computational methods and tools. London: Springer, 2014.
GOLDSCHMIDT, G.; SEVER, A. L. Inspiring design ideas with texts. Design Studies, 32, 2011, pp.139-155.
GOLDSCHMIDT, G.; SMOLKOV, M. Variances in the impacto f visual stimuli on design problem solving performance. Design Studies, 27, 2006, pp.549-569.
GONÇALVES, M.; CARDOSO, C.; BADKE-SCHAUB. How far is too far? Using diferente abstraction levels in textual and visual stimuli. In: Design 2012: 12th International Design Conference, Croatia, 21-24 maio de 2012. The Design Society, 2012.
GONÇALVES, M.; CARDOSO, C.; BADKE-SCHAUB, P. What insires designers? Preferences on insirational approaches during idea generation. Design Studies, 35, 2014, pp.29-53.
GORDON, 1961 GORDON, W. J. J. Synectics: the development of creative capacity. London: Collier Books, 1961.
KAO, CHEN-YAO. Exploring the relationships between analogical, analytical, and creative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 2014, pp.80-88.
KIM, E.; HORII, H. A study on an assessment framework for the novelty of ideas generated by analogical thinking. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 2015, pp.1396-1406.
KUMAR, V. 101 Design Methods: a structured approach for driving innovation in your organization. New Jersey: Willey, 2013.
LINSEY, J. S.; WOOD, K. L.; MARKMAN, A. B. Modality and Representation
in Analogy. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 22, 2, 2008.
MALAGA, R., The effect of stimulus modes and associative distance in individual creativity support systems. Decision Support Systems, 29, n2, 2000, pp.125-141.
Martin A. The Design and Evolution of a Simulation/Game for Teaching Information Systems Development. Simul. Gaming, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 445–463, Dec. 2000.
MORENO, D.; HERNÃNDEZ, A.; YANG, M.; LINSEY, J. AND WOOD, K. A Step Beyond to Overcome Design Fixation. Design Computing and Cognition DCC’14. J.S. Gero (ed), Springer, 2014, pp. 1-15.
NAGAI, Y.; TAURA, T.; MUKAI, F. Concept blending and dissimilarity: factors for creative concept generation process. Design Studies, v. 30, 2009, pp.648-675.
PEREIRA, Priscila Zavadil. O pensamento criativo no processo projetual: proposta de um framework para auxiliar a criatividade em grupos de design. 2016. Tese (Doutorado em Design), Escola de Engenharia e Faculdade de Arquitetura, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2016.
SALEN, Katie; ZIMMERMAN, Eric. Regras do jogo: fundamentos do design de jogos (vol. 3). Editora Blucher, 2012.
SARKAR, P.; CHAKRABARTI, A. The effect of representation of triggers on design outcomes. Artificial Intelligence for Engineerign Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 22, 2008, pp.101-116
SCHELL, J. The art of Game Design. Burlington, MA: Elsevier, 2008
SHERRY, J. L.; DESOUZA R.; GREENBERG B.; LACHLAN K. Relationship between developmental stages and video game uses and gratifications, game preference, and amount of time spent in play. International Communication Association Conferência Anual, San Diego, CA, 2003
SMULDERS, F.; LOUSBERG, L.; DORST, K. Towards diferente communication in collaborative design. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, v.1, n. 3, 2008, pp.352-367.
STERNBERG, R. J. Psicologia Cognitiva. São Paulo: Cengage Learning, 2000.
TSCHIMMEL, K. C. Design as a Perception-in-Action process. In: TAURA, T,; NAGAI, Y (Eds). Design Creativity 2010. London: Springer, 2011.
TSCHIMMEL, K. C. Sapiens e Demens no pensamento criativo do design. 2010. Tese (Doutorado em Design). Universidade de Aveiro, Departamento de Comunicação e Arte, Aveiro, 2010.
TSENG, I.; MOSS, J.; CAGAN, J.; KOTOVSKY, K. The role of timing and analogical similarity in the stimulation of idea generation in design. Design Studies, 29, 2008, pp.203-221.
VERHAEGEN, P.; D’HONDT, J.; VANDEVENNE, D.; DEWULF, S.; DUFLOU, J. Identifying candidates for design-by-analogy. Computers in Industry, 62(4), 2011, pp.446-459.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Seção
Licença
This journal, following the recommendations of the Open Access movement, provides public access to all its content, following the principle that free access to research generates a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with the reading and citing an author's work.
The author must ensure:
-
that there is a full consensus of all co-authors in approving the final version of the document and its submission for publication.
-
that their work is original, and if the work and / or words of other people were used, they were duly recognized.
Plagiarism in all its forms constitute unethical publication behavior and is unacceptable.
The articles and other published works, become the property of the journal.
The contents of e-Journal LOGO are licensed under a Creative Commons License 4.0 by. It reserves the right to use software or other methods of detecting plagiarism to analyze the submitted works.
Under the license you have the right to:
- Share - copy and redistribute the material in any media or format
- Adapt - remix, transform, and create from material to any purpose, even if commercial.
- The licensor can not revoke these rights as long as you respect the license terms.
According to the following terms:
- Assignment - You must give the appropriate credit, provide a link to the license and indicate if changes have been made. You must do so in any reasonable circumstance, but in no way do you suggest to the licensor to support you or your use.
- No additional restrictions - You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything that the license permits.
The authors of papers submitted to the e-Journal LOGO authorize their publication in physical and electronic media for academic purposes. The authors also agree on the distribution of articles by national and international indexing databases, whether or not for profit, and can be reproduced as long as the source is cited.
O autor deve garantir:
- que haja um consenso completo de todos os coautores em aprovar a versão final do documento e sua submissão para publicação.
- que seu trabalho é original, e se o trabalho e/ou palavras de outras pessoas foram utilizados, estas foram devidamente reconhecidos.
Plágio em todas as suas formas constituem um comportamento antiético de publicação e é inaceitável.
Os artigos e demais trabalhos publicados, passam a ser propriedade da revista.
Os conteúdos de e-Revista LOGO estão licenciados sob uma Licença Creative Commons 4.0 by. Reserva-se o direito de usar software ou otros métodos de detecção de plágio para analisar os trabalhos submetidos.
Segundo a licença você tem direito de:
- Compartilhar — copiar e redistribuir o material em qualquer suporte ou formato
- Adaptar — remixar, transformar, e criar a partir do material para qualquer fim, mesmo que comercial.
- O licenciante não pode revogar estes direitos desde que você respeite os termos da licença.
De acordo com os termos seguintes:
- Atribuição — Você deve dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Você deve fazê-lo em qualquer circunstância razoável, mas de maneira alguma que sugira ao licenciante a apoiar você ou o seu uso.
- Sem restrições adicionais — Você não pode aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.
